Winding products (WP)
represent either a finished product or a workpiece used for the creation of
composite materials, electrical coils of various shapes and purposes, and
filtering elements of the winding type. In such products, layers of wound
threads of different natures, ranging from volumetric textured threads to wire,
form filtering barriers for the retention of mechanical particles, liquids, and
gases. Depending on the application, materials with the required mechanical,
thermal, and chemical properties are used for winding, ensuring durability and
high efficiency of the products in aggressive or extreme operating conditions.
Numerous studies have been
devoted to the application and development of fiber-reinforced polymer
composite materials (PCM) in various industries. In the petrochemical industry,
pipes based on PCM are widely used [1]. In aerospace and rocket production, the
winding method is used to create aircraft fuselages and airplane wings [2, 3,
4, 5, 6], among other components. Winding products are also employed in
shipbuilding, as evidenced by the works [7, 8]. In the chemical industry,
PCM-based pipes with specific hydraulic and mechanical properties are produced
[9, 10]. Lightweight and strong materials are in demand in mechanical
engineering, and studies in this area are presented in works [11, 12].
Winding products, used as
filtering aerators, are discussed in the studies [13, 14, 15].
Traditional methods of
analysis and design for winding products are limited in their capabilities. The
complex internal structure of the winding makes it difficult to analyze its
characteristics and optimize production processes. The lack of effective
visualization and analysis tools for the structure of winding products
complicates the design process, leading to high costs and extended development
time. One of the areas for studying the properties of winding products is the
development of their computer representation in the form of 3D models. Using
this approach allows the analysis of the internal structure of winding products
(WP) at the design stage, determination of optimal winding process parameters,
and solving optimization tasks related to the structure of WP to achieve the
required physical and mechanical properties (strength, stiffness, permeability
of the product).
The developed digital models
can be widely applied in the creation of composite materials, setting
properties for filtering components, determining the quality of yarn dyeing in
packages, and other areas of application.
The proposed method for
constructing a 3D model of a winding product (WP) includes building multiple
cross-sections of the winding product, sequentially connecting the winding
turns within the WP body, and assigning volume to the winding turns using 3D
modeling tools. The calculation scheme of a cylindrical winding product is
shown in Figure 1, where 1 is the starting point of the winding turns, 2 are
the sections of the mandrel, 3 are the sections of the threads, and DH is the
outer diameter of the mandrel. A cylindrical coordinate system OZYφ
is introduced for the modeling, with the OZ axis
coinciding with the rotation axis of the WP. The sections of the WP body are
made with half-planes
αk passing through
the OZ axis. The position of each half-plane relative to the axis is defined by
the angle
φk, measured from a selected
initial half-plane in a plane perpendicular to the OZ axis.
Figure 1: Calculation Scheme
of WP Sections by Half-Planes
Let us consider the section
formed by plane
α1
(Figure 1). We
assume that the winding turns start from the point with coordinates (0, DH
+0.5, 0) in the cylindrical coordinate system, where d is the thread diameter.
The coordinates of the centers of the winding turns in the cross-section of WP
by plane
α1
are denoted as
,
,
where m is the
number of the turn and 1 is the section number. Similarly, we denote the
coordinates of the centers of the winding turns in corresponding sections of
the WP body by half-planes
αk
as
,
.
When calculating the
coordinates of the winding centers, the following assumptions are made: the
thread is wound onto the surface of the product in the form of a spiral with a
constant pitch; the change in winding direction occurs instantaneously (edge effects
are not considered); after laying, the thread does not shift; deformations of
the thread and product are considered insignificant and not accounted for; the
cross-sections of the threads have a constant diameter and are represented as
circles.
During the creation of a
computer 3D model of the winding product, the coordinates
,
of the centers of
the winding turns with the same numbers m are sequentially connected, forming a
data array for constructing a 3D spiral. Each new spiral with number m is
attached to the previous spiral with number m-1, forming a complete set of
coordinate points on the central axis of the thread wound onto the mandrel.
After this, using the 3D modeling tools of CAD software, the thread in the
model gains volume by moving the thread section with diameter d along the
trajectory of the 3D spiral consisting of the turns.
The method of constructing the
winding turns' sections is described in the paper [16]. The array of center
coordinates is calculated in a custom program in MATLAB and saved in a file in
EXCEL format. To construct the 3D spiral in KOMPAS-3D, the prepared array of
point coordinates is read from the EXCEL file and then transformed into a
spline. It should be noted that, as a result of calculations, a large array of
point coordinates is generated, which leads to significant time consumption
when converting the data into a spline.
After building the 3D spiral
and creating the thread cross-section sketch in the form of a circle with
diameter d in the selected plane in KOMPAS-3D, the volume is added to the
thread along the trajectory of its turns using the "Element along
trajectory" operation, which completes the construction of the computer 3D
model of the WP. During the construction process, an error
"self-intersecting surface" sometimes occurs, caused by the sharp
transition of the thread at the ends of the WP (see Figure 2). To eliminate
this error, the thread diameter d can be reduced, for example. Figure 3 shows
an enlarged fragment of the 3D model of the WP. The mandrel is shown in yellow,
over which the thread sections are placed. The larger diameter circles
demonstrate the initially specified thread diameter.
Figure 2 Threads on the edges
of the winding product
Figure 3 Enlarged
cross-sectional fragment of the winding
Using the proposed method, a
series of computer 3D models of cylindrical winding products (WP) was
constructed. During the construction process of the 3D models, it was revealed
that generating a large number of turns simultaneously when creating the 3D
spiral leads to significant time consumption, both for converting the data
array into a spline and for performing the "Element along trajectory"
operation. To reduce these time costs, it is recommended to divide the initial
point coordinate data array into several parts. After generating all the parts
sequentially, the complete computer 3D model of the WP can be obtained through
a merging operation. When the distance between the center points of the
sections forming the winding turns is small, the interpolation of the 3D spiral
by a spline can be replaced by linear interpolation.
Figure 4 shows the result of
obtaining the computer 3D model of the WP for the following parameter values: B = 60 mm, d = 0.5 mm, H = 20.65 mm, m = 120.
Figure 4 Computer 3D model of
the winding product (WP)
From Figure 4, it can be seen
that the model is quite complex and contains a large volume of data, which
creates limitations for its further application in CAE (computer-aided
engineering) programs. Based on this, the model needs to be simplified.
The article [17] shows that
the structure of the winding products (WP) can be effectively described using
the apparatus of continued fractions.
The initial data for
synthesizing the forging includes:
- the diameter
𝑑
of the wound thread with a circular cross-section;
- the dimensions of the wound WP (B – width of the WP, mm; D – current
diameter of the WP, mm);
- the limits within which the angle of the winding threads
𝑎
must lie, degrees.
As shown in the article [17], the structure of the WP can be described
by a sequence of integers
α0,
α1
,…αn.
The number
α0
characterizes the
pitch of the wound thread spiral H, and together with the values
B
and
D
defines the angle of the winding threads, such that
.
To ensure the required winding structure with specified step sizes of
the corresponding orders, one can represent
k
as a continued fraction:
|
(1)
|
a0=4;a1=31;a2=a3…=0,
|
and k represents the gear ratio.
Assume we want to obtain winding with the following parameters:
Height of winding = 250 mm,
,
,
òîãäà
,
and formula (1) for the specified type of winding
takes the form
In 497 turns, the thread guide
will make 124 double runs. Let's find H.
;
Then
H1
can be found using the formulas:
|
(2)
|
|
As a result of the
calculations, the following parameters were obtained:
Gear ratio
:
B-250mm;
H=124,7485 mm;
H1=1,0060 mm;
H2=0 mm
(see
Table 1).
Based on formula (1), it is
evident that the structure of the forging has repeating elements. To save
computer resources, we will keep 2 steps of winding and find new parameters for
the gear ratios and the height of winding while maintaining the structure of
the winding (H and H1).
The winding height for two
steps will have the following formula:
|
(3)
|
From the obtained expression, we can determine
Based on the acquired data,
all calculations can be performed for other winding products, and computer
models of various structures can be constructed, selecting the necessary
parameters for their implementation on winding devices (see Table 1). For
better visualization, models with two winding steps have been built.
This sequence represents the
coefficients of the continued fraction obtained from the decomposition of the
rational fraction
for example, using the Euclidean algorithm.
Let's consider the repeating turns of the thread in the unfolded view
(Figure 5).
The triangles ABC and MDE are isosceles. The heights BH and DK divide
the base of the triangles into equal parts. Therefore, AH + LM = HC + CL, which
means that HL = H/2, where H is the turn step.
Based on the graphical solution, it can be observed that the winding
steps repeat. Thus, we can isolate an element without disrupting the structure
of the winding product and create a model based on it for further calculations
in CAE
Figure 5 Unfolded view of the
thread winding
TABLE 1. WINDING PRODUCTS
Closed structure
B = 250 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 124.7485 mm
H1 = 1.0060 mm
H2 = 0
α = 0.4155
Thread diameter d = 0.85 mm
|
Figure 6 Winding product
with a closed winding structure, gear ratio
|
Same structure, but with different gear ratios
B’ = 125.2516 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 124.7485 mm
H1 = 1.0060 mm
H2 = 0
α = 0.4155
Thread diameter d = 0.85 mm
|
Figure 7 Computer model of
thread winding with a closed structure, gear ratio
|
Closed structure
B = 250 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 49.8982 mm
H1 = 1.0183 mm
H2 = 0
α = 0.1747
Thread diameter d = 0.9 mm
|
Figure 8 Winding
product with a closed winding structure, gear ratio
|
Same structure, but with different gear ratios
B’ = 50.4073 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 49.8982 mm
H1 = 1.0183 mm
H2 = 0
α = 0.1747
Thread diameter d = 0.9 mm
|
Figure 9
Computer model of thread winding with a closed structure, gear ratio
|
Closed structure
B = 250 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 61.7409 mm
H1 = 6.0729 mm
H2 = 1.0121
α = 0.4155
Thread diameter d = 1 mm
|
Figure 10 Winding product with a closed winding structure, gear ratio
|
Same structure, but with different gear ratios
B’ = 64.7773 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 61.7409 mm
H1 = 6.0729 mm
H2 = 1.0121
α = 0.4155
Thread diameter d = 1 mm
|
Figure 11 9
Computer model of thread winding with a closed structure, gear ratio
|
Honeycomb structure
B = 250 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 54.3478 mm
H1 = 10.8696 mm
H2 = 0
α = 0.2124
Thread diameter d = 1 mm
|
Figure 12
Winding product
with a honeycomb structure, gear ratio
|
Same honeycomb structure, but with different gear ratios
B’ = 59.3478 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 54.3478 mm
H1 = 10.8696 mm
H2 = 0
α = 0.2124
Thread diameter d = 1 mm
|
Figure 13
Computer model of
thread winding with a honeycomb structure, gear ratio
|
Honeycomb structure
B = 250 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 95.5882 mm
H1 = 22.0588 mm
H2 = 7.3529 mm
α = 0.3260
Thread diameter d = 1 mm
|
Figure 14
Winding product
with a honeycomb structure, gear ratio
|
Same honeycomb structure, but with different gear ratios
B = 106.61765 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 95.5882 mm
H1 = 22.0588 mm
H2 = 7.3529 mm
α = 0.3260
Thread diameter d = 1 mm
|
Figure 15
Computer model of
thread winding with a honeycomb structure, gear ratio
|
Spiral structure
B = 250 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 60.9879 mm
H1 = 12.0968 mm
H2 = 0.5040 mm
α = 0.2124
Thread diameter d = 1 mm
|
Figure 16
Winding product
with a spiral structure, gear ratio
|
Same structure, but with different gear ratios
B’ = 67.0363 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 60.9879 mm
H1 = 12.0968 mm
H2 = 0.5040 mm
α = 0.2124
Thread diameter d = 1 mm
|
Figure 17
Computer model of
thread winding with a spiral structure, gear ratio
|
Spiral leading structure
B = 250 mm
H = 60.9673 mm
Í1 = 12.2616
H2 = 0.3406
α = 0.2044
Thread diameter d = 1 mm
|
Figure 18
Winding product
with a spiral leading structure, gear ratio
|
Same structure, but with different gear ratios
B’ = 67.0981 mm
D = 95 mm
H = 60.9673 mm
Í1 = 12.2616
H2 = 0.3406
α = 0.2044
Thread diameter d = 1 mm
|
Figure 19
Computer model of
thread winding with a spiral leading structure, gear ratio
|
Let’s summarize all the data
in the table.
TABLE 2. STRUCTURE OF THE WP
¹ Experiment
|
Â, mm
|
Í, mm
|
H1, mm
|
H2, mm
|
α, ðàä
|
a0
|
a1
|
a2
|
1
|
à
|
250
|
124,7485
|
1,006
|
0
|
0,4155
|
4
|
124
|
0
|
á
|
125,2516
|
124,7485
|
1,006
|
0
|
0,4155
|
2
|
124
|
0
|
2
|
à
|
250
|
49,8982
|
1,0183
|
0
|
0,1747
|
10
|
49
|
0
|
á
|
50,4073
|
49,8982
|
1,0183
|
0
|
0,1747
|
2
|
49
|
0
|
3
|
à
|
250
|
61,7409
|
1,021
|
1,0121
|
0,4155
|
8
|
10
|
6
|
á
|
64,7773
|
61,7409
|
1,021
|
1,0121
|
0,4155
|
2
|
10
|
6
|
4
|
à
|
250
|
54,3478
|
10,8696
|
0
|
0,2124
|
9
|
5
|
0
|
á
|
59,3478
|
54,3478
|
10,8696
|
0
|
0,2124
|
2
|
5
|
0
|
5
|
à
|
250
|
95,5882
|
22,0588
|
7,3529
|
0,3
260
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
á
|
106,61765
|
95,5882
|
22,0588
|
7,3529
|
0,3
260
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
6
|
à
|
250
|
60,9879
|
12,0968
|
0,5040
|
0,2
124
|
8
|
5
|
24
|
á
|
67,0363
|
60,9879
|
12,0968
|
0,5040
|
0,2
124
|
2
|
5
|
24
|
7
|
à
|
250
|
60,9673
|
12,2616
|
0,3406
|
0,2044
|
8
|
5
|
8
|
á
|
67,0981
|
60,9673
|
12,2616
|
0,3406
|
0,2044
|
2
|
5
|
8
|
Thus, the proposed method for
developing computer 3D models of cylindrical winding products includes the
following steps: creating a part file with a template; creating a 3D sketch of
the winding turns (3D spiral) by importing point coordinates from an Excel
file; creating auxiliary geometry, which uses the cross-sectional plane of the
winding product passing through the axis of rotation and the starting point of
the winding turns, positioned perpendicular to the trajectory; constructing a
circle with a diameter d in the created plane; generating a 3D model of the
thread using the "Sweep along path" operation. If processing a
significant amount of data is required, these steps should be repeated. To
reduce the data volume, a 3D model of only the repeating elements of the
winding product should be created instead of the entire product. The winding is
modeled as a continued fraction, and the repeating elements, which are shown on
the unrolled winding path, are identified and analyzed in terms of geometry. 3D
models of different types of windings are presented. Calculations of winding
products with predefined parameters are provided. Repeating elements of the
winding product structure are highlighted. This allows for the creation of an
optimal 3D model that replicates the structure of any type of winding. The
model can be used for further research and employed as a digital model of the
winding product.
1. Kotov N. S. Oil and Gas. "Attica" // Sphere. 2021. No. 3(82). Pp. 66-69.
2. Vasiliev V. V., Barynin V. A., Razin A. F. Anisogrid Composite Lattice Structures - Development and Application in Space Technology // Composites and Nanostructures. 2009. No. 3(3). Pp. 38-50.
3. Sequeira H., Faria H., Funk R. Manufacturing of Composite Cylinders with Integrated Lattice Structure Using Winding // 16th European Conference on Composite Materials: ECCM 2014. Pp.1-8.
4. Muritz A. P., Gellert E., Birchill P., Challis K. Overview of Promising Composite Structures for Navy Ships and Submarines // Composite Structures. 2001. Pp. 21-42.
5. Pryaditsky A. A. Review of Research on the Design of Lattice Structures Made of Composites for Aviation and Rocket Construction // Questions of Aircraft Design and Manufacturing. 2014. No. 1. Pp. 15-21.
6. Samipur S. A. Design and Manufacturing Technology of Lattice Structures for Aircraft with a Braided Reinforcement System: Ph.D. Thesis / Samipur Sajjad Aliasgar. Kazan: 2018. 134 p.
7. Shipbuilding. UMATEX, ROSATOM State Corporation. URL: https://umatex.com/applications/shipbuilding/ (accessed: 09.07.2024)
8. Gnennoy O. Composites in Russian Shipbuilding: What Are the Prospects?. URL: https://www.korabel.ru/news/comments/kompozity_v_rossiyskom_sudostroenii_kakovy_perspektivy.html (accessed: 09.07.2024)
9. Radulovic Y. Composite Plastic Pipes with Filament Winding: Correlation Between Winding Structures and Their Hydraulic and Mechanical Properties // Scientific and Technical Review. 2011. Vol. 61. No. 3-4. Pp. 73-77.
10. Heisskraft-therm System. Design and Installation Guide for Pressure Pipelines Made of Random Copolymer Polypropylene PP-R // Heisskraft Plastic Piping Materials. 82 p.
11. Otmakhov D. V. Study of Polymer Composite Materials Obtained by Filament Winding // Scientific Notes of TOGU. 2014. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 97-102.
12. Zaharychev S. P., Ivanov V. A. Development of a Radial Winding Unit for the Production of Reinforced Polymer Composite Materials // Bulletin of TOGU. 2008. No. 1(8). Pp. 101-110.
13. Panin A. I. Development of a Model of the Specific Density of Winding as a Function of the Shift Angle of Turns and the Thickness of the Wound Yarn Layer // Bulletin of DITUD. 2001. No. 3.
14. Gubeydullina K. K., Shigapov I. I., Kadyrova A. M. Aeration of Wastewater on Livestock Farms // Bulletin of UGSHA. 2012. No. 4(20). Pp. 114-117.
15. Nikolaeva S. D., Panin I. N., Tsimbalyuk E. P., Boyarkina M. A. On the Structure of the Dispersing Layer of "Pantex" Pneumatic Aerators // Proceedings of Higher Education Institutions. Technology of the Textile Industry. 2010. No. 2(323). Pp. 48-52.
16. Rokotov N. V., Tomilova O. V., Markovets A. V., Ponomar A. A. Development of a 3D Model of a Winding Product // Bulletin of Saint Petersburg State University of Technology and Design. Series 4: Industrial Technologies. 2022. No. 3. Pp. 25-30.
17. Rokotov N. V., Bespalova I. M., Markovets A. V. Analysis of Precision Winding // Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Technology of Light Industry. 2016. Vol. 32. No. 2. Pp. 22-26.