The
following methods of estimating the true or logarithmic deformation during
sheet metal drawing are used in the practice of material forming: by means of
moiré strips, deformed grids and strain gauges, polarization-optical and
by means of hardness measurements. These methods are divided into two large
groups: contact methods, i.e. methods in which the strain is calculated either
by measuring the displacement of a point with measuring tools or requiring
special sensors (e.g. strain gauges), and non-contact methods, i.e. methods in
which the strain is calculated on the basis of the obtained optical
information.
Measuring
the deformation during a sheet metal forming process, such as drawing, at each
point of the material being deformed is a complex task. The metal sheet
undergoes not only deformation in the sheet plane, but also in thickness, as a
result of thinning and thickening. Figure 1 shows commercially produced sheet
metal representative parts.
With
the development of computer methods for simulation of sheet metal forming
processes, it has become much easier to evaluate their deformation. The use of
computer programs instead of theoretical calculations is due to the variety of
combined problems, each of which requires a large set of theoretical formulas.
Programs based on the finite element method (FEM) are devoid of this and solve
the problem on the basis of data on, for example, displacements and velocities
at the nodal points of the finite element mesh, which is used to discretize the
object under study. On the basis of the obtained results the design of the tool
forming surface is taken place, which today can be performed both by
traditional approaches and by solving the optimization problem of the
non-forming surfaces, for example, by topological optimization algorithms,
which help to reduce the tool mass saving their rigidity [4-8].
Fig. 1. Examples of the metallic sheet parts: vehicle body side
part (a) and B-pillar (b)
[1],
housing part
(c)
[2]
and special
application parts (d)
[3]
There
is a sufficiently great number of Russian and foreign works, in which the
deformation of materials is assessed in a non-contact manner, during mechanical
tests, with further plotting flow curves, forming limit diagrams, etc. Many
works contain the research on the application of non-contact strain assessment systems:
to collect data on material behavior for subsequent accurate computer
simulation of sheet material fracture under different loading conditions
(uniaxial tension, bulging test according to standard ISO 16808:2022)
[9];
for capturing
strains of sandwich structure based on steel sheet and glass fiber
[10];
to measure
the strain of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic specimens according to GOST R 56799–2015
[11];
to clarify
the macroscopic localization of non-uniform plastic flow as a result of the
Porteven-Le Chatelier effect of aluminum specimens at different stress-strain
states (SSS) [12, 13]; to obtain information on the ultimate forming curve
by the Marcignac method, according to the standard ISO ISO-12004-2-2021
[14];
for
determining critical strain values in uniaxial tension of steel specimens with
stress concentrators
[15],
for
determining the strain field when testing composite materials based on
glass-textolite and carbon fiber-reinforced plastic under uniaxial tensile
pattern
[16].
Based on
non-contact algorithms of strain estimation, a system can be developed to
determine the micro- and macro-architectonics of the surface based on captures
of the surface of a welded stainless steel specimen subjected to fatigue
testing
[17].
The use of
non-contact systems hides a number of peculiarities, for example, when the part’s
geometry is complex and the material is heterogeneous, the material is a
sandwich-like structure, i.e. a combination of metal sheet and polymer adhesive
bonding, e.g. motor fan housing
[18].
When
deforming such a material, measurement error may occur due to inhomogeneity of
temperature distribution along the material thickness due to different
thermophysical values of material properties, and the ultimate deformation of
layers and their subsequent delamination may remain undetected.
Logarithmic
strain refers to the natural logarithm of the ratio of the final size to the
initial size, Eq. (1), and, according to the law of equality of the volume of
the body before and after deformation, the sum of strains along three
directions is equal to zero, the Eq. (2)
[19].
Thus, if we
know the value of deformation in one of the three directions, then the value of
deformations in the second and third directions can be determined by
theoretical dependence, for example, by the Eq. (3), for the case of
axisymmetric cup drawing.
where
dim0
and
dim
– initial and end dimensions of the investigated object;
– radial stress, circumferential stress
and longitudinal stress, respectively;
– radial strain, circumferential strain
and longitudinal strain, respectively.
Given
the current global trends in mechanical testing and measurement techniques,
more and more research activities is being done on non-contact methods of
strain assessment with the incorporation of artificial intelligence algorithms.
There are several levels: neural networks (NN), deep learning (DL), machine
learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), in the narrow and broad sense.
According to the modern terminology, each level includes the previous one, with
the highest level being artificial intelligence and the lowest or basic level
being neural networks
[20].
At the DL
stage, the machine is trained by searching for the best algorithm, without
human assistance. At the ML stage, the machine actively uses all kinds of
existing databases (DB), and at the AI stage, the solution is created
completely without human participation, by the machine itself.
It
is quite possible to assume that the application of AI in process design is
possible and expected, as a lot of practical experience has been accumulated
and can be used in ML, algorithms of NN have been developed, including
convolutional NN, deep trust NN, generative adversarial NN, recurrent NN,
Boltzmann machine or stochastic recurrent NN and others.
The
algorithm of AI block implementation may look as follows (Fig. 2). First, the
operator manually enters a set of data relevant to the process, forming a data
group or data sets. This includes data describing the physical, mechanical and
operational properties of the materials to be formed, equipment data, initial
CAD geometry of the object, etc. On the basis of these data, FE-simulation and
experiment are carried out independently, in parallel, until the moment of getting
of several variants of the results. In case of FE-simulation there can be
several variants. In the case of experiments, there can be several variants of
results as well, but unlike FE-simulation, this is due to the purity of
experiments, not the data set. After that, the solutions are being compared to
each other (validation step) and with the number (A), which characterizes the
adequacy of the computer model or the accuracy of the solution using numerical
simulation.
Fig. 2. Algorithm of “digital twin – technological process”
development
In
case of a significant deviation of the solution from the results of a
full-scale experiment, the AI algorithm is activated and challenging to find
out the cause of the discrepancy and offers options of manual (variant 1) or
automatic (variant 2) correction of values in the data group, both for experiments
and for numerical simulation. The procedure continues until a solution that
meets the selected adequacy criterion is obtained. The realization of such an
algorithm is impossible without timely collection and processing of information
at different production stages. In the work
[21]
it is
shown that it is possible to introduce optical 3D-scanning technologies for
bolts into the production line, but the speed of 3D-model preparation and
analysis compromises the procedure of full product control, as modern equipment
has a higher forming rate.
The
existing non-contact experimental method of strain estimation or the digital
image correlation method (DIC) allows real-time recognition of the change in
the position of points of the deformed specimen. One of four algorithms is
applied in the strain calculation stage according to this method: subset shape
function (calculates strains from the subset shape function and the deformed
subset shape, with the size of the virtual strain gauge (virtual strain gauge
or VSG) corresponding to the size of the subset; finite-element shape function
(calculates strain based on triangulation, for which the nodes of the
finite-element mesh are characteristic dark or light speckl (pixel, dot) of the
pattern applied to the specimen); strain shape function (local fitting of
polynomial or spline shape deformation function to displacements in order to
obtain an analytical equation of the displacement field, after which
deformations are calculated based on spatial derivatives of the resulting
analytical equation); spline fit (global spline fitting of the displacement
field)
[22].
It
was shown in
[23]
that the
DIC can be applied for the Erichsen cupping test considered in this paper.
However, it should be emphasized that the evaluation is performed on the outer
surface of the specimen, which does not give an idea of the behavior of the
material inside. For this purpose, computer modeling (simulation) is used,
which gives a complete picture of the technological process. However, based on
theoretical dependencies of deformation description, e.g., Green-Lagrange
definition of deformation, Eq. (4), we can arrive at Eq. (5), which relates the
deformation and thickness of the material, discussed in detail in
[24]
and
[25].
|
(4)
|
|
(5)
|
where
λ
– ratio of the end sample length to the initial
sample length;
tf
and
ti
– end and initial
sample thickness, respectively;
ε1
and
ε2
– max. and
min. principal stresses, respectively.
Deep
learning and neural network algorithms are applied in the technique of DIC. In
the article
[26]
the
application of convolutional NN is considered. It is shown that training of NN
should be carried out on higher quality sets of speckle patterns.
Another
modern non-contact method of strain assessment is 4D-tomography. The essence of
the method is the continuous process of tomography of a sample subjected to
plastic deformation. In
[27]
the
influence of strontium inclusions on the nature of fracture of hot-rolled
aluminum alloy sheet specimens under uniaxial tension was studied, and strain
resistance plots were determined. In most cases, ductile fracture of the
specimens was established, indicating high plastic properties of the material
under study. In
[28],
the results
obtained by 4D-tomography were confirmed using the DIC technique.
The
purpose of this study is to objectively evaluate the capabilities of modern
non-contact deformation control tools available in the university laboratory
and their adequacy. The task of the study is to evaluate the deformation of
aluminum sheet blank by the Erichsen cupping test, and the following techniques
are used:
•
experimental
evaluation of cupping test on specialized equipment;
•
numerical
simulation of the cupping process using several damage models;
•
image
matching or digital image correlation;
•
optical
3D-scanning based on infrared or optical structured light projection.
The
use of several evaluation techniques is due to the fact that during material
forming the strain can refer both to the outer and inner surface of the object
and to the inner region. The fact is that plastic forming of a sheet blank
leads to the appearance of different thicknesses in the material, which is the
result of anisotropy of properties in the material caused by inclusions, phase
composition, defects such as micropores and microcracks, as well as hardening
in the process of deformation. Due to these circumstances, deformation
estimation would be only declarative if numerical simulation was excluded from
consideration.
The
application of a complex study is a more budget-friendly alternative to the
most expensive 4D–tomography, because in addition to the equipment for its realization
requires a powerful workstation with specialized software.
The
use of DIC together with computer modeling will improve the accuracy of
deformation determination on curved surface areas. Supplementing such a
technique with elements of artificial intelligence (Fig. 2) will accelerate the
search for the best combination of parameters. By implementing this approach,
the third stage of development of the digital twin is actually realized
[29],
the process
of building bilateral relations between the real and virtual object, which is
not a finished product, but a technological process.
For
study the evaluation of strain by non-contact method let us consider obtaining
experimental data in the course of deformation of a sheet strip, 1.2 mm thick,
made of aluminum alloy AMg2, according to the Erichsen cupping test scheme, l.
According to GOST 10510-80 and ISO 20482, during this test the material is
deformed until failure by moving the punch in opposite to gravity direction.
The shape of the punch and tools is selected based on the type of material and
its dimensions. The results of this test are used to determine the amount of
punch displacement at which specimen failure occurred. In this study, a tool of
type design 1 (according to GOST 10510-80), is used, shown in Fig. 3.
|
à)
drawing
|
|
b) 3D-model, ¼
cut away
|
Fig. 3. Drawing of the toll with blank (a) and its 3D-model
without blank (b)
During
the experiments it was found out that the sample fracture occurs at a punch
displacement of 11 mm, deformation force of 590 kg or 0,0059 MN, and max.
thinning at the material fracture point
δ
= 0,4 mm. These initial data are taken as
reference values and are used further for validation of numerical simulation
results and optical strain estimation methods.
Fig.
4 shows the step-by-step formation of the hemisphere and the final specimen
with a diametric cross-section.
Numerical
simulation of the Erichsen cupping test is performed in the QForm software. Table
1 shows the process parameters to be set. The problem was modeled in
three-dimensional formulation. Table 2 shows the specified material properties.
To describe the nature of the material flow, a yield curve or flow curve was
used, reflecting the hardening of the material during the plastic deformation
stage, described by equation (6), which coincides with the four-coefficient
form of the Hensel-Spittel equation at m1
= m3
= m4
=
0, equation (7).
Table
1.
Technological parameters
Parameter
|
Unit
|
Value
|
Workpiece
material
|
-
|
ÀÌã2
|
Punch
velocity
|
mm
/
s
|
2
|
Max.
punch force
|
MN
|
0,1
|
Blank holder
force
|
MN
|
0,02
|
Contact
friction formulation
|
-
|
Levanov’s
friction law
(m
= 0,5)
|
Max.
punch
displacement
|
mm
|
12
|
Table 2.
Physical
and mechanical properties
Parameter
|
Unit
|
Value
|
Density
|
kg
/
m3
|
2 690
|
Thermal
conductivity
|
W
/
mK
|
159
|
Heat capacity
|
J/kg K
|
963
|
Young module
|
GPa
|
71
|
Poisson’s
ratio
|
-
|
0,33
|
Thermal
linear expansion coefficient
|
1/°C
|
2,4e-5
|
|
(6)
|
|
(7)
|
where
– yield (flow) stress;
– logarithmic strain;
k
– hardening
coefficient (yield stress at
ε
= 1);
n
– strength coefficient;
mi
– coefficients, relates
the influence of temperature, strain rate and punch velocity.
Isotropic
hardening conditions (by Mises) and anisotropic hardening conditions for sheet
materials (by Hill-Mises) were chosen as plasticity conditions (yield
criterion). The damage model was specified through the forming limit diagram
(FLD), as well as through the modified Cockroft-Latham-Oh (abbr. C-L-O) model
[30].
Table 3 shows
the values of the coefficients of the equations of the models used in the
calculations.
Table
3.
Equations’ coefficients
Parameter
|
Unit
|
Value
|
yield
criterion
|
r0;
r45;
r90
|
-
|
0,1403; 0,1825; 0,2077
|
yield curve
|
k;
n
=
m2
|
MPa; -
|
194,09; 0,07351
|
flow/forming
limit diagram (FLD) damage model
|
Rm;
δìàêñ.
|
-; mm
|
0,178; 0,4
|
modified Cockroft-Latham-Oh
damage model
|
α
;
εmax
|
-; -
|
0,5; 0,05
|
|
a) presentation
of successive forming stages of hemisphere from the strip
|
|
|
b) end form
of fractured blank
|
c)
blank’s
cross-section
|
Fig. 4. Blanks after Erichsen cupping test
According
to the simulation results the technological information is obtained. The graph
of deformation force against punch displacement shows the moment of load drop,
which is caused by excessive thinning of the material and its subsequent failure
(Fig. 5).
Fig.
6 shows the forming limit diagram and fracture regions of the material when the
FLD model is used.
Fig. 5. Punch displacement vs. deformation force at the end of
Erichsen test
|
a) formability
and fracture zones
|
|
b)
FLD
|
Fig. 6. Results of numerical simulation for FLD damage model
The
fields of effective strain values and fracture regions are shown in Fig. 7.
According to the model described by the FLD, it can be seen that the fracture
occurs in the dome part, while it is not possible to specify a clearly defined location
of the fracture initiator. At a punch displacement of 11 mm, the fracture
spreads throughout the entire dome region. According to the Cockcroft-Latham-Oh
model, it is possible to identify a ring-shaped area located below the dome
crest, where the maximum stresses develop.
|
a) triaxiality
(ηmax
= 0,89, red dome
region corresponds the range 0,65…0,89)
|
|
b) Lode parameter
(Lmax
= 0,99, red ring region corresponds the range 0,8…0,99)
|
|
c) effective
deformation field (FLD model)
|
|
d) effective deformation
field (C-L-O model)
|
Fig. 7. Results of numerical simulation for different damage models
The
level of stress triaxiality, determined by equation (8) and reflecting the
ratio of hydrostatic pressure to equivalent stress (is a function of the first
and second invariants), and the Lode parameter, determined by equation (9) and
is a function of the second and third invariants, indicate the compliance of
the scheme with biaxial tension.
Fig.
8 shows a diagram of the relationship between the Lode parameter (via Lode
angles) and the stress triaxiality as a function of the SSS of the material.
|
(8)
|
|
(9)
|
where
– effective stress (on Mieses);
– hydrostatic pressure;
θ
– Lode angle.
Fig. 8. Graphical correlation between Lode parameter and stress
triaxiality
[31]
Image
processing can be performed using subroutines written in C++, MathLab, Java or
Phyton programming languages. Machine vision algorithms have advanced
significantly, and a large number of open source codes have appeared, e.g., DIC
engine
[32],
which allow
processing raster information and determining object deformation values in
time. The well-known systems including hardware and software are Aramis and
Argus from GOM (a division of Carl Zeiss), StrainMaster from LaVision,
laserXtens from Zwick-Roell, and AutoGrid from ViALUX.
When
determining strain, an important aspect is the ability to determine the
location of reference points belonging to the material being deformed with high
accuracy. There are two known methods to estimate the mutual location of points
in space: speckle interferometry and digital image correlation (DIC). With
speckle interferometry it is possible to determine the shift of point objects
forming a certain image. With DIC, it is possible to correlate changes in some
image, not necessarily a point image. In both cases, observation of objects over
time is required, with images recorded after a certain time interval. The
methods can be applied jointly, i.e., the estimation of changes in the position
of point objects can be performed also by DIC algorithms.
For
realization of such a combined method it is required to prepare the sample
surface and to draw a special pattern on it. For example, for realization of
the method of deforming grids it is required to draw a pattern on the sample in
the form of a grid formed by intersecting parallel lines with known cell
parameters. In contrast, the speckle interferometry method requires the
creation of a point pattern with a unique, non-repeating distribution pattern.
The main requirements for the pattern are the following: non-glare surface,
points of different diameters and its chaotic distribution. Figure 9 shows
variants of pattern preparation with non-glare-free (left) and glare-free (right)
surfaces. To perform DIC, it is enough to create a certain pattern, i.e. a
drawing with repeating elements.
Fig. 9. Pattern on the blanks’ surfaces, prepared using sprayed
black paint
In
both cases, the necessary patterns can be created either manually or by
engraving methods, including non-contact laser engraving. Fig. 10 shows some
samples of a computer prepared templates or pattern in the upper row, and
samples with the laser engraved pattern applied in the lower row.
Fig. 10. Patterns on the blanks,
prepared by laser engraving
During
the tests, continuous video recording in FullHD mode (resolution of 1980 x 1080
and higher) is performed. After the video recording is obtained, it is
storyboarded, saving, for example, every tenth frame. Then in the GOM Correlate
software the obtained set of frames is loaded to the frame scale and the
recognition of point movements with strain estimation is carried out for all
the images-frames in automatic mode (Fig. 11). Bicubic interpolation of
subpixels is used. In case of insufficient information the program shows
displacement of only some points (Fig. 11a). It is also possible to
additionally compare surface points, enter reference points for matching,
exclude redundant points from the image analysis area or region of interest
(abbr. ROI, Fig. 11b).
|
a) field of equivalent
strains
|
|
b) assigning
points to the surface (left) and excluding redundant points (right) from the ROI
|
|
c) field of equivalent
strains (left – mid-process; right – end-process, after crack building) and
views of real blanks during deformation stage
|
Fig. 11. Preparing and recognition the blank surface applying DIC
and SPECKL
In
case of successful recognition, a color scheme or a color map of
displacements/deformations of individual points is plotted on the surface of
the ROI (Fig. 11c).
After
the experiments, the failure blanks were subjected to optical 3D-scanning using
a RangeVision Neopoint 3D-scanner, which operates on the infrared (IR)
structured light projection, realized on laser diodes, guaranteeing measurement
accuracy up to 50
μm.
Before scanning, a
matting spray like developer was applied to the samples to create a uniform
reflection coefficient over the entire surface of the object. Scanning was
carried out in scanning mode on a rotary table with a rotation angle step of 30°,
which allows to create 12 scans, on the basis of which a polygonal stl-model is
reconstructed. The average error value at the scan stitching stage was 51
μm.
Fig. 12à
shows the stl-model of one of the samples
presented from different angles.
|
|
a) comparison
of the real sample after Erichsen cupping test (upper line) with its digital
geometrical twin (lower line)
|
b) distances between
two polygonal stl-models
|
Fig. 12. Comparing the end polygonal stl-models
Comparing
the models after numerical simulation and 3D scanning in the GOM-Correlate
program, it can be noted that the maximum deviation is observed in the dome
part of the sample and is
Δ
= +0,85
ìì
(Fig. 12b). In this case,
it is possible to correct the displacement of the punch at which the results
were uploaded, i.e. 10,74 mm + 0,85 mm = 11,59 mm (according to Fig. 5).
On
the other hand, it is also possible to reach this value through numerical simulation,
i.e., to reduce the deviation value
(Δ)
by defining a constant time step, which will
increase the calculation time, but in addition to obtaining a more accurate
value of height, it will also make it possible to determine the value of the
limiting deformation more accurate. The areas shown in gray are those that are
partially excluded from consideration. They show that the dimensions of the
original workpiece used for numerical modeling were slightly larger than the
dimensions of the experimental specimen.
This
was due to the need to obtain additional information on the SSS of material
under the blank holder. In the experiment, the blank holder contacted not
always over the entire area of the contact surface, which resulted in the
retraction of a part of the workpiece into the area of plastic deformation.
Application
of experimental non-contact methods of strain estimation will considerably
simplify the procedure of strain value estimation at manufacturing of complex
sheet parts by metal forming operations. Nowadays, such methods are the results
of approbation of a new technology and methodology, according to which they can
be used for cases of laboratory study of mechanical properties, since they
require preparation of the blank surface, availability of a calibrated system
and special software. It is extremely difficult to apply them to control
deformation of complex sheet parts during the process run.
To
date, the most reasonable is the combined use of numerical simulation tools and
subsequent mechanical testing using, for example, DIC.
The
tasks of Erichsen testing of a sheet blank made of aluminum alloy AMg2,
followed by numerical simulation of the process and speckle-DIC method of strain
assessment based on the results of video recording of the experiment were
successfully performed and showed that numerical simulation requires
information about the coefficients included in the calculation models of material
flow and fracture, and speckle-DIC requires specimen preparation. The additional
application of optical 3D-scanning will allow the introduction of quality control
information on the resulting specimen geometry after testing. The generalized
results of experimental studies and numerical simulation can be used to create
AI aimed at developing a digital twin of the technological process.
[1]
https://aat.moscow/avtomobilnaja-promyshlennost/
(date of last access 17.10.2023).
[2]
http://www.stamping.by/industry/shtampovannye-izdeliya-iz-metalla
(date of last access 20.10.2023).
[3]
https://3dprintingcenter.net/desktop-metal-introduces-figur-g15-a-new-technology-for-digital-sheet-metal-forming-which-has-nothing-to-do-with-3d-printing/
(date of last access 20.10.2023).
[4]
Xu, D., Chen, J., Tang,
Y., & Cao, J. (2012). Topology optimization of die weight reduction for
high-strength sheet metal stamping. International Journal of Mechanical
Sciences, 59(1), 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.03.006
[5]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=J-SPyER7tFs
(date of last access 20.10.2023).
[6]
Azamirad,
G., & Arezoo, B. (2016). Topology optimization of stamping die components
using evolutionary structural optimization method. Proceedings of the
Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering
Manufacture, 231(4), 690–698. doi:10.1177/0954405415597630
[7]
Su,
T. C., He, T., Yang, R., & Li, M. (2021). Topology optimization and
lightweight design of stamping dies for forming automobile panels. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-791304/v1
[8]
Petrov M.A., Urzhumov P.N.,
Numerical Simulation of the Hot Bulk Forming Process of the “CAP” Like Forming
with Topology Optimization of the Tool Set, Russian Internet Journal of
Industrial Engineering, 2022, Vol. 9(2), pp. 3–9.
[9]
Effect of ductile damage
evolution in sheet metal forming: experimental and numerical investigations / F.
Abbassi, O. Pantale, S. Mistou, A. Zghal, R. Rakotomalala // Key Engineering
Materials. 2010. ¹ 446.
Ñ. 157–169.
DOI: 10.4028/
www.scientific.net/KEM.446.157
[10]
Kraft-
und Deformationscharakteristika beim Umformen eines Stahlblech-Verbundwerkstoffs
/ M. Petrov, S. Guk, J. Bast, P. Petrov // Lightweight Design. 2012. ¹5.
Ñ. 50–57. DOI:
10.1365/s35725-012-0023-5
[11]
Definition
of area of the maximum shear deformations for CFRP samples on Iosipescu method,
with use of optical system of measurements / A.V. Ilichev, A.M. Gubin, A.R.
Akmeev, N.V. Ivanov // Trudy «VIAM».
2018. ¹6.
pp. 99–109.
DOI:
10.18577/2307-6046-2018-0-6-99-109
[12]
Tretyakova
T.
V.
Ocenka
vlijanija
slozhnogo
naprjazhenno
-
deformirovannogo
sostojanija
na
projavlenie
jeffekta
Portevena
-
Le
Shatel'e
v
Al
-
Mg
splave
//
Ajerokosmicheskaja
tehnika,
vysokie
tehnologii
i
innovacii.
2021. Vol. 2. pp. 206–209.
[13]
Besnard
G., Hild F., Roux S. “Finite-element” displacement fields analysis from digital
images: Application to Portevin-Le Châtelier // Experimental Mechanics.
2006. ¹46(6), Ñ. 789–803.
DOI:
10.1007/s11340-006-9824-8
[14]
Agha
A., Abu-Farha F. A Method for Measuring In-Plane Forming Limit Curves (FLC)
using 2D Digital Image Correlation // SAE MobilityRxiv™ Preprint. 2023. URL:
https://mobilityrxiv.sae.org/preprint/a-method-for-measuring-in-plane-forming-limit-curves-flc-using-2d-digital-image-correlation--sae-pp-00322
(date of last access 03.08.2023).
DOI: 10.47953/SAE-PP-00322
[15]
In
situ opredelenie nepreryvnoj jevoljucii v prostranstve i vo vremeni
deformacionnyh polej na stal'noj plastine s koncentratorom naprjazhenij / V.A. Vlasov,
A.S. Plyaskin, A.A. Klopotov [etc.] // Modern construction materials and
technologies: Conference Proceedings of the III International Conference, Kaliningrad,
26–29 May 2020 / M.A. Dmitrieva, eds., Vol. 3, Kaliningrad: Immanuil Kant
Baltic Federal University, 2021. pp. 164–172.
[16]
Strungar
Å.
Ì., Lobanov D.S.
Development of the digital image correlation (DIC) method for mechanical
testing at elevated temperatures.
PNRPU Mechanics Bulletin, 2022, no. 3, pp.
147-159. DOI: 10.15593/perm.mech/2022.3.15
[17]
Kibitkin
V.
V.,
Solodushkin
A.
I.
Uvelichenie
ploshhadi
kontrolja
pri
izmerenii
deformacii
tverdogo
tela
metodom
korreljacii
cifrovyh
izobrazhenij
//
Izvestija
vuzov.
Fizika. 2021. ¹ 64. pp. 32–37.
DOI:
10.17223/00213411/64/4/32
[18]
Numerical
and Experimental Investigation of Deep Drawing of Sandwich Panels / S. Tipalin,
M. Petrov, B. Saprikin, N. Kosatchyov, N. Shpunkin, P. Petrov // Key
Engineering Materials. 2014. Vols. 611-612,
Ñ. 1627–1636. DOI:
10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.1627
[19]
Popov
E.A. Osnovy teorii listovoj shtampovki. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1977. 278 p.
[20]
Russel S.J.,
Norvig P., Artificial Intelligence. A modern Approach, 2
nd
edition,
2003, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, p. 1080.
[21]
Petrov
M.A., El-Deeb I.S.A., To the development of the algorithm for the inline
inspection of the geometric and technological parameters on the example of cold
bulk forging of a bolt blank, Kuznechno-shtampovochnoe proizvodstvo. Obrabotka
materialov davleniem, ¹4, 2020, pp. 39–48
[22]
https://idics.org/guide/DICGoodPracticesGuide_ElectronicVersion-V5g-181022.pdf
(date of last access 20.10.2023).
[23]
M. Aydin, X.
Wub, K. Cetinkaya, M. Yasar, I. Kadi, Application of Digital Image Correlation
technique to Erichsen Cupping Test, Engineering Science and Technology, an
International Journal, 2018, Vol. 21,
Ñ. 760–768.
[24]
Van Mieghem,
B., Ivens, J., & Van Bael, A. (2016). Consistency of Strain Fields and
Thickness Distributions in Thermoforming Experiments Through Stereo DIC.
Experimental Techniques,
40(5), 1409–1420. doi:10.1007/s40799-016-0143-4
[25]
Gonzalez, M.
M., Lutes, N. A., Fischer, J. D., Woodside, M. R., Bristow, D. A., &
Landers, R. G. (2019). Analysis of geometric accuracy and thickness reduction
in multistage incremental sheet forming using digital image correlation.
Procedia Manufacturing,
34, 950–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.105
[26]
Boukhtache, S.,
Abdelouahab, K., Berry, F., Blaysat, B., Grédiac, M., & Sur, F.
(2021). When Deep Learning Meets Digital Image Correlation. Optics and Lasers
in Engineering, 136, 106308. doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106308
[27]
Samei, J.,
Sadeghi, A., Mortezapour, H., Salavati, S., Amirmaleki, M., Pekguleryuz, M.,
& Wilkinson, D. S. (2020). 4D X-ray tomography characterization of void
nucleation and growth during deformation of strontium-added AZ31 alloys.
Materials Science and
Engineering: A, 797, 140081. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.140081
[28]
Nazari-Onlaghi,
S., Sadeghi, A., Karimpour, M., & Pekguleryuz, M. (2021). Fracture
micro-mechanisms in hot-rolled AZ31 and AZ31-Sr magnesium alloys.
Materials Science and
Engineering: A, 812, 141107. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.141107
[29]
Kitain L. The
New Age of Manufacturing: Digital Twin Technology & IIoT, The New Age of
Manufacturing, 2018, http://www.innovation4.cn/library/r46394 (date of last
access 20.10.2023).
[30]
Stebunov S.,
Vlasov A., Biba N. Prediction of the fracture in cold forging with modified
Cockcroft-Latham criterion // Procedia Manufacturing. 2018. ¹ 15.
Ñ. 519–526.
DOI:
10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.264
[31]
Lou
Y., Yoon J.W., Huh H. Modeling of shear ductile fracture considering a
changeable cut-off value for stress triaxiality // International Journal of
Plasticity.
2014.
¹ 54. Ñ. 56–80.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.08.006
[32]
https://www.sandia.gov/ccr/software/digital-image-correlation-engine-dice/
(date of last access 20.10.2023).