Many tasks in Digital Humanities (DH)
research involve the processing of the linked data, wherein the graph theory
appears to be a powerful methodological and technological base for solving
associated problems. Taking into account the specifics of DH, the considered
data are normally quite big, but their handling requires human attendance and
cannot be fully automated. One of the key means to help DH specialists to
fulfill their everyday work is scientific visualization and visual analytics
(VA) that allows to present related data in an observable interpretation-ready
form. Our goal is to develop an ergonomic and flexible tool for graph-based
visualization of interconnected data that allows comprehensive VA in DH
research. The new high-level component for circular graphs’ visualization is
presented to tackle data filtering problems and improve the cognitive power of
visual analytics. High-level ontology-driven data extraction, transformation
and loading (ETL) mechanism is proposed to enable obtaining the data from
different sources and process them in a flexible way. The software developed is
demonstrated by solving the problems from the applied linguistics domain.
Along with the traditional tools for graph
VA (like node search based on regular expressions, highlighting of incident
edges and connected nodes, depicting clusters by colors, etc.) we propose the
following key features:
1.
Ontology-driven data ETL mechanism that allows
obtaining the input data from different sources and preprocessing them by
custom algorithms defined by means of high-level visual programming language.
2.
Multilevel ring scale placed around the circular
graph that allows grouping the graph nodes according to the given classifier
and automatically reordering them at runtime.
3.
Equalizing filter that allows applying different
filtering thresholds to different groups of graph nodes/edges to cut off the
noisy data, which noise has a non-uniform strength distribution across the
graph.
4.
Graph state calculator that allows data
comparison by performing different operations (union, intersection, etc.) on
the data slices shown within the graph.
5.
Synchronization of the data slice currently
visualized by the graph with the corresponding localized area on the geographical
map (selecting a specific area on the map opens up the data slice on the graph
that is linked to this area, and vice versa, choosing specific data slice on
the graph highlights the corresponding area on the map).
VA is no doubt
a powerful methodology to conduct research in a field of DH, but, as indicated
in [1], nowadays there is a noticeable talent gap between the VA scholars
and digital humanists. While DH and VA have a huge potential of coevolution,
the research results presented in the literature are typically valuable either
only for DH, or only for VA, and rarely for both simultaneously [1]. This
is because DH projects often lack researchers with deep computer science
skills, and consequently have to rely on the existing general-purpose
visualization tools, instead of driving the actual software development. But in
that case, some tasks remain unsolved because of traditional software
limitations [1, 2]. W. Huang et al. tackle this problem by proposing
a so-called user-centered approach to the process of visualization making
(graph-based visualization in particular). This approach ensures the creation
of cognitive graphics tools, which development comprises design and evaluation
stages [2]. On the design stage, “the designer applies design principles
and chooses the visualization best supporting perception and cognition”, and on
the evaluation stage “visualization is evaluated to understand how cognitive
processes are affected” [2].
Similar, but
slightly less formal approach is proposed by S. Jänicke, who describes an
“ideal” VA+DH project as a close collaboration between the computer scientists
and digital humanists, where each visualization feature proposed is immediately
tested and validated in terms of its viability for DH research and then either
approved for further development or rejected [1]. Working on our VA tools,
we have chosen this exact strategy.
For graph
visualization, the Gephi system is traditionally used [3]. Being
feature-rich, this system, however, provides instruments for layout the graphs
of free structure, while we found out that sometimes the circular
graphs [4] are more comprehensive by depicting data sets. Moreover, as
stated in [5], it is often desirable to have the graph visualization tools
in a Web application, without installing additional software.
An important
point of graph visualization is the data preparation stage. To ensure the
intuitive and flexible data preparation process we suggest to declare its steps
by data flow diagrams (DFDs) [6]. A lot of popular visualization software
use such an approach, for example, Blender, Maya, Substance Designer, etc., so
it proved its efficiency in terms of data processing and rendering pipeline
declaration.
We use
model-driven architecture based on the ontology engineering methods [7] to
achieve the configuration flexibility and adaptation of the software to the
specifics of the application domain without source code modification. We
construct the ontologies within visual editor ONTOLIS [7].
Our previous
research work was dedicated to the development of ontology-driven scientific
visualization and VA system called SciVi (https://scivi.tools) [8].
This system is portable across all the popular platforms
(Windows, GNU/Linux, macOS, iOS, Android). It is organized as a client-server
application, having both thick (native, written in C++ using Qt 5 framework)
and thin (browser-based, written in TypeScript and JavaScript, utilizing HTML5
and CSS3) clients. The behavior of this system is fully controlled by
underlying ontologies, which allow deep reconfigurations of SciVi, extension of
its ETL and data rendering capabilities, whereby leveraging adaptation to the
completely new visualization and analytics tasks without changing the source
code of its core. Faced the problems in a field of DH during the case study of
verbal and nonverbal behavior of social network users, we built the graph VA
toolset upon the SciVi [9]. Tried out different graph layouts, we focused
on the circular one because of its good readability [4].
We implemented
a graph visualization SciVi component (called SciVi::CGraph) as a Web
application in TypeScript utilizing PixiJS (https://www.pixijs.com)
rendering engine. The graph nodes are uniformly distributed on a
circle and the edges are drawn as quadratic Bézier curves with the
control point in the circle’s center. Different slices of data can be displayed
on the same graph using a scale of states that allows fast switching between
them. Data slices can be organized in a hierarchy, therefore this scale
supports multiple levels. Examples of different graphs can be found online:
https://graph.semograph.org/cgraph/.
SciVi tools
have been integrated into the Semograph information system [10]. Semograph
is aimed to solve different DH tasks involving methods of computational
linguistics by supporting a wide range of operations on the textual content,
including tagging, classification of terms, building semantic relations, etc.
The integration with SciVi allowed us to utilize advanced visualization
features including the rendering of graphs.
The conceptual
scheme of the data processing within the SciVi system is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Data processing pipeline within SciVi
Currently, CSV
format is used to transfer data from Semograph into SciVi, since export to this
format is natively supported by Semograph. However, it is easy to switch to any
other data representation since the ETL mechanism of SciVi is very flexible.
This mechanism is implemented within the SciVi Data Processing Module and
driven by the ontological knowledge base. Underlying ontologies describe
different data formats and data interpretation rules, as well as available data
preprocessing filters and data visualization techniques. Thanks to this,
changing or extending these ontologies is enough to alter SciVi behavior
adapting it to the new VA tasks. But the changing of ontologies requires
knowledge engineering skills, thereby is unwanted for the end-users and is
dedicated to the system administrator.
The end-users
are provided with a more high-level steering instrument: Data Flow Editor. This
SciVi module is based on the Rete (https://rete.js.org/)
JavaScript framework and implements a graphical user interface
(GUI) to compose a data processing algorithm from the high-level building
blocks utilizing DFDs. The example of DFD describing the extraction of data
from an arbitrary CSV file is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. DFD defining ETL and data
visualization in SciVi
Each node in
the DFD represents a particular step in data obtaining, processing or
visualization. For example, “CSV Table” defines file reading; “Get Range”
allows to specify the subset of values within the CSV table; “Make Nodes” sets
up the composition of the graph nodes internal representation; “Make Graph
Data” corresponds to the stage of interconnecting the graph nodes with weighted
edges; “Circular Graph” defines the data rendering using SciVi::CGraph VA
component. Links between DFD nodes depict the data flow and their color is
bound to the type of transmitting data.
The set of
available DFD nodes’ types correspond to the set of operations on the data
available in SciVi. It is constructed automatically according to the underlying
ontology and presented to the user as a toolbar palette. Each data processing
operation has its own description that may be altered or extended to change the
actual behavior of the entire system. For example, the ontology fragment
describing “CSV Table” is shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Fragment of SciVi ontology describing
CSV table reader
It can be seen
that the “CSV Table” node is treated as a data source, has CSV file as a
setting parameter and table of values as an output. The inputs and outputs are
drawn as round sockets in Fig. 2. Settings are not presented in the Fig. 2,
since they appear in a special context menu within the SciVi DFD editor, when
the users clicks on the corresponding DFD node.
The actual
implementation of this data reader is described by the “CSV Table Worker”
concept in the ontology. This concept has an internal attribute (not drawn in
the figure, since the figure shows concepts and relations only) with a link to
the JavaScript code fragment that implements CSV reading with help of PapaParse
(https://www.papaparse.com)
library. An important part of the “CSV Table” description is the
“ClientSideWorker” concept. It identifies that the reading and parsing takes
place within the browser (on the client side), without sending the data to the
SciVi server. Although the SciVi architecture allows server-side processing,
currently the amounts of data we faced in our tasks were small enough to be
handled locally.
The ontology
fragment describing “Circular Graph” is presented in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Fragment of SciVi ontology describing
circular graph VA component
“Circular
Graph” is a visual object that has two inputs: “Data” (“GraphData” type) and
“Classifier” (“Grid” type), as well as two settings: “Title” (“String” type)
and “SortNodes” (“Bool” type). “Data” represents the actual data set that is to
be visualized as a graph. “Classifier” represents the dictionary that defines
groups for the graph nodes. Then the groups are represented by a special ring
scale (see Section 6.1). “Title” is a user-defined string that is placed on top
of the graph during the visualization. “SortNodes” is a user-defined flag that
switches whether graph nodes should be ordered lexicographically, or their
order should be retained from the input data.
In
the ontology, the client-side implementation of “Circular Graph” is presented
by the node named “CGraph”. This implementation uses the SciVi::CGraph library
written in JavaScript. It is worth noting that this library is also a part of
the OpenSource SciVi project:
https://github.com/scivi-tools/scivi.graph.
The distinctive features of SciVi::CGraph are described in details
in the next section.
While the SciVi
platform contains different VA components, in this paper we focus on the
SciVi::CGraph. SciVi::CGraph VA component accepts the data in JSON
representation. Once the user has created the DFD for the particular task and
started the visualization, this component renders the graph and provides its
own GUI allowing different interactions with that graph, including zooming,
panning, nodes and edges selection, data filtering, etc. The most important
distinctive features of SciVi::CGraph are described below.
In case, when a classification of graph
nodes is defined, SciVi::CGraph draws a special ring scale around the graph to
visually highlight the given nodes’ classes. The number of rings in this scale
is potentially unlimited, so the nodes’ classifier can have multiple levels. A
special tree view in a sidebar of the graph allows to explore the classifier
and switch the visibility of nodes belonging to individual classes. Colors of
the ring sectors, which depict the classes, can be assigned manually, but also
set automatically based on the special heuristic algorithm that maps the
classifier’s hierarchy to the HSV color model in a way the neighbor ring
sectors have distant colors to be visually distinguishable.
To evaluate different hypotheses, the user
can change the order of scale rings by drag and drop, command the graph to sort
the nodes accordingly and set the color of nodes to the color of any ring
sector they belong to. These interactions help to find out, which order of
hierarchy levels is the most meaningful one in terms of structuring the
interconnected data.
Fig. 5 shows the results of the
correlation analysis of 38 topics extracted from 48 stories told by informants
as self-presentation [11]. The interactive graph is available online:
https://graph.semograph.org/cgraph/aboutmyself/index.html.
The sample of informants is balanced by sex, age, and education
level. Graph nodes depict self-presentation texts, edge thickness represent
correlations coefficients (all correlations are positive; all coefficients
below 0.8 are filtered out). Social (education level: secondary, higher) and
demographic (sex, age group) parameters are shown on the ring scale groping the
nodes accordingly. The groups are nested according to the order of the rings.
Fig. 5. Correlation of topics in
self-presentations, grouped by age (a), education (b), and sex (c)
The aim is to find out, which parameter
dominates by grouping the informants together. Related to DH it means to find,
which social/demographic informant groups consolidate more by talking about
themselves. Related to the graph theory it means to find, which layout of nodes
provides their better clustering. The proposed mechanism of the ring scale
reordering allows quick checking of different variants and inspecting them
visually. While Fig. 5a (topmost grouping by age) and 5b (topmost grouping
by education level) look messy, Fig. 5c reveals significant dense
“community”, corresponding to the stories told by females (at the same time,
there is almost no correlation between males’ stories). Further interpretation
of this material is outside of this paper’s scope, but the corresponding
milestone of related DH research is considered to be reached. It is worth
noting, that it took less than a minute to find this solution using
SciVi::CGraph.
Sometimes the noisy data on a single graph
may have a non-uniform distribution of the noise strength. In this case,
filtering the entire data set with the single threshold appears to be
meaningless and threshold adaptivity is required. We often face this problem in
multipartite graphs comprising interconnected data of different nature, or
data, which parts were differently preprocessed. To tackle this problem, we
propose a so-called equalizing filter that can have individual parameters for
selected groups of nodes and edges (resembling the sound equalizer that can
differently affect selected parts of the spectrum).
Currently, the equalizing filter within
SciVi::CGraph operates as a set of range-based cutoff functions tied to the
ring scale. By default, there is one global cutoff function (affecting the entire
graph), but, if needed, the user can add auxiliary local ones for any sector of
the ring scale. If a node or an edge is affected by multiple cutoff functions
(global one and multiple local ones according to the hierarchy of the ring
scale), their ranges are intersected to build the resulting filter. Node or
edge is filtered out if its weight lays outside the functions’ range
intersection.
The practical use case of the equalizing
filter is demonstrated in Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Relationships between the verbal
behavior of social network users and their psychological characteristics
This figure represents the filtered data of
the relationships between the verbal behavior of social network users (SNUs)
and their psychological characteristics. The interactive graph is available
online:
https://graph.semograph.org/cgraph/psycho_reduced/index.html.
The psychological parameters are obtained by two questionnaires
(personality features and self-esteem) [12] fulfilled by the sample of
SNUs. The verbal behavior is revealed with the help of the linguistic analysis
from the comments written by these users in social networks. The filtering is
individual for each psychological parameter because each of them has its own
statistical features (minimum, maximum, average, standard deviation). This
approach allows leaving only the dominant indicators for each psychological
parameter. Fig. 6 demonstrates, that after equalizing the indicators, it can
be revealed that the SNUs of the female gender, who use obscene words in the
public social network space, are characterized by low self-esteem, low
conscientiousness, low agreeableness, high neuroticism, middle openness, and
low extraversion.
To visually compare the structure of data
slices displayed in the graph, we implemented a special graph state calculator.
It allows to perform a sequence of basic set operations on the graph states:
union, intersection, difference, and symmetric difference.
Fig. 7 demonstrates the states of
“Moscow” geoconcept. The interactive graph is available online:
https://graph.semograph.org/cgraph/geoconcepts_reduced/index.html.
In this research, under the term “geoconcept” we understand a set
of collective opinions about a geographical object. These opinions can be
revealed from the associations people come up with [13]. Graph nodes
represent the semantic categories of associations (extracted according to the
special classifier within Semograph system), edges identify the co-presence of
linked categories in the analyzed associates (derived from a group of
informants). The actual structure of geoconcept presented as a set of
association categories depends on the region. In this experiment we collected 3
datasets: in Perm (Fig. 7a), Biysk (Fig. 7b) and Orenburg. The state
scale (drawn below the graph) provides quick navigation between these data sets
and makes it possible to visually compare them. However, to make this
comparison more elaborated and meaningful, set operations can help. As an
example, Fig. 7c shows the intersection of Perm and Biysk data sets,
allowing to view their common parts.
Fig. 7. States of “Moscow” geoconcept as
viewed in Perm (a) and Biysk (b) along with their intersection (c)
Thus, the graph state calculator provides a
good basis for conducting comparative DH studies and facilitates the process of
interpreting research results.
The data obtained during the DH research
are often linked to the particular geographical regions, for example,
countries, cities, or even to the specific addresses. Cognitive representation
of these data for the sake of visual analytics involves geographical maps.
However, according to Schneiderman’s Mantra “Overview First, Zoom and Filter,
Details on Demand” [14], the simple placing of markers on the map is not enough
for the full-fledged comprehensive visual analytics. While the “Overview”,
“Zoom”, and “Filtering” are normally achievable on the map itself, the last but
not least part of getting “Details on Demand” often requires additional
visualization and analytical means.
In our practice we had to work with the
slices of interconnected data, where each slice is linked to the specific
geographical area (represented as a set of points with geographical
coordinates). Each slice can be represented by the SciVi::CGraph, but the
distribution of corresponding points should be visualized on the map to allow
adequate overview and zooming. To follow the workflow defined by Schneiderman’s
Mantra, we came up with synchronizing SciVi::CGraph and map in a way, that
selecting the specific area on the map opens up the corresponding graph and
vice versa, choosing specific data slice on the graph highlights the
corresponding area on the map. This synchronization provides the user with the
ability to get the detailed information about the interest region on demand.
To enable this kind of synchronization, we
slightly changed the ontology-based description of “Circular Graph” VA
component, appending a new input and a new output responsible for receiving and
transmitting the data slice selection. The updated ontology fragment describing
the “Circular Graph” is shown in Fig. 8. Nodes retained from the original
ontology (as shown in Fig. 4) are filled white, relations retained from the
original ontology are drawn dotted. Newly introduced nodes are highlighted
yellow, newly added relations are drawn solid.
Fig. 8. Extended ontology describing circular
graph VA component
As seen in the figure, it is just a matter
to enrich the ontology with 3 new nodes and 6 new relations to add the new
functionality to SciVi without any source code modification of the SciVi core.
“Select State” and “State Selected” describe string messages that are received
and transmitted respectively by the graph VA component.
This ontology change has two major effects
within SciVi. The first one is a change of “Circular Graph” DFD node interface.
Fig. 9a depicts the “Circular Graph” DFD node as it appeared before
ontology was being modified, and Fig. 9b reflects the update. As it can be
seen, “Circular Graph” got two additional sockets, the input one called “Select
State”, and the output one called “State Selected”.
|
|
a
|
b
|
Fig. 9. Comparison of circular graph DFD node
interface before (a) and after (b) ontology modification
The second effect of ontology modification
relates to the “Circular Graph” VA component internals. Two variables are
automatically generated and are accessible via special internal dictionaries.
First one is read-only and accessible via “Selected State” tag; second one is
write-only and accessible via “State Selected”. These variables serve to pass
the messages about the state changes. The related message passing source code
is automatically generated. The only thing we had to append manually are four
lines of code within “Circular Graph” VA component JavaScript implementation
(the SciVi core remains unchanged):
if
(HAS_INPUT["Select State"]
&&
INPUT["Select State"])
graph.selectGraphState(INPUT["Select State"]);
else if
(graph.stateChanged())
OUTPUT["State Selected"]
=
graph.currentState();
As a result, graph VA component became
capable of synchronizing its selected state (shown slice of data) with other VA
components, for example, the ones implementing the geographical maps. Further,
if the corresponding nodes or relations are removed from the ontology, whereby the
“Selected State” and “State Selected” variables will not exist anymore, there
is no need to revert the changes in the code of VA plugin: the internal SciVi
mechanisms take care of eliminating the “dead code” automatically at runtime.
So, enabling and disabling the state selection functionality can be now
performed via ontology modification only.
To visualize the interactive map, we
integrated SciVi with the Leaflet
(https://leafletjs.com)
library. This library is easy to use and suits well for
lightweight 2D scientific visualization of geo-tagged data, despite it supports
no hardware acceleration of rendering [15]. We described two new visual
components in the SciVi ontology: “Map” (that is responsible to visualize the
map using Leaflet) and “Map Markers” (that accepts a table of objects with
their properties, including geographical coordinates, turns them into a set of
Leaflet map markers, and manages the map selection).
One of DH use cases in the area of cultural
geography that utilizes the means described above is devoted to the study of
the meaning of slogans transmitted between the people in the informal urban
space (taking into account different districts, such as central districts, sleeping
quarters and suburbs). The social slogans (521 inscriptions on walls, fences
and other street objects) in the urban space of Perm were collected from
different districts of the city and then categorized with help of Semograph
system by genre, topic, lexic, writing method and other characteristics. The
aim of VA tools is to depict the slogans on the city map and the results of
their categorization into the groups with the same semantics. The DFD composed
of the updated “Circular Graph” node and corresponding map-related nodes is
shown in Fig. 10.
Fig. 10. DFD describing the synchronized
graph and map VA components
The visualization result that corresponds
to the DFD from Fig. 10 is shown in Fig. 11. As it can be seen, when multiple
visual objects appear in the DFD, SciVi automatically applies tile-based layout
to place the corresponding views on the screen all at once.
This feature enables simultaneous analysis of different visual models.
Fig. 11. Distribution of slogans in the Perm
city synchronized with the graph depicting slogan characteristics grouped by
districts
Thanks to the features
discussed, SciVi::CGraph allows advanced interactive VA of interconnected data
in DH, harnessing the power of visual analytics and Data Science. According to
the feedback from the DH researchers of Perm State University, these tools
outperforms traditional graph analysis software like Gephi in the tasks, which
require special analytics features. Like SciVi VA system, SciVi::CGraph is an
open-source project licensed under the terms of GPLv3:
https://github.com/scivi-tools/scivi.graph.
SciVi::CGraph is being
iteratively developed in close collaboration with DH specialists and each new
feature is immediately evaluated in real-world research projects (in exact
accordance with the cooperation model described in [1]). For example,
SciVi::CGraph was used by exploring the egocentric field of speaker in the
macedonian language [16], in the study of social network users’ speech in
the research project of Perm State University [17], and by the semiotic
analysis of geomental maps [13]. Also, SciVi::CGraph was utilized in the
Sirius education center in the project “Images of Large Russian Cities in the Linguistic
Consciousness of Senior Schoolchildren” [18].
Taking into account the
needs of conducted DH research, we plan to extend our scientific visualization
system SciVi with new feature-rich visualization components for free structure
graphs and graphs with volumetric 3D layout. Next, we plan to test the
scalability of our tools handling different massive data collections.
The reported study is supported by Russian
Science Foundation (grant number 20-18-00336).
We would like to thank Elena Erofeeva, Ekaterina Khudyakova, Natalia Zelianskaia and Tatyana Surnina for help in data assembling and processing, as well as for the valuable feedback about the SciVi::CGraph usability.
1.
Jänicke, S. Valuable Research for
Visualization and Digital Humanities: A Balancing Act // Workshop on
Visualization for the Digital Humanities, IEEE VIS 2016, Baltimore, Maryland,
USA. – 2016.
2.
Huang, W., Luo, J., Bednarz, T., Duh, H. Making
Graph Visualization a User-Centered Process // Journal of Visual Languages and
Computing. – 2018. – Vol. 48. – PP. 1–8.
DOI:
10.1016/j.jvlc.2018.07.001.
3.
Grandjean, M. Introduction to Network
Visualization with GEPHI [Electronic Resource]. – 2013. URL:
http://www.martingrandjean.ch/introduction-to-network-visualization-gephi/
(last accessed: 17.10.2020).
4.
Ageev, A. A Triangle-Free Circle Graph with
Chromatic Number 5 // Discrete Mathematics. – 1996. – Vol. 152. – PP. 295–298.
DOI: 10.1016/0012-365X(95)00349-2.
5.
Tominski, C., Abello, J., Schumann, H. CGV – An
Interactive Graph Visualization System // Computers & Graphics. – 2009. –
Vol. 33, I. 6. – PP. 660–678.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2009.06.002.
6.
Lee, B., Hurson, A.R. Issues in Dataflow
Computing // Advances in Computers. – 1993. – Vol. 37. – PP. 285–333.
DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60407-6.
7.
Chuprina, S., Nasraoui, O. Using Ontology-based
Adaptable Scientific Visualization and Cognitive Graphics Tools to Transform
Traditional Information Systems into Intelligent Systems // Scientific
Visualization. – 2016. – Vol. 8, No. 3. – PP. 23–44.
8.
Ryabinin, K., Chuprina, S. High-Level Toolset
for Comprehensive Visual Data Analysis and Model Validation // Procedia
Computer Science. – 2017. – Vol. 108. – PP. 2090–2099.
DOI:
10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.050.
9.
Ryabinin, K., Belousov, K., Chuprina, S.,
Shchebetenko, S., Permyakov, S. Visual Analytics Tools for Systematic
Exploration of Multi-Parameter Data of Social Web-Based Service Users //
Scientific Visualization. – 2018. – Vol. 10, No. 4. – PP. 82–99.
DOI: 10.26583/sv.10.4.07.
10.
Belousov, K., Erofeeva, E., Leshchenko, Y., Baranov, D. “Semograph”
Information System as a Framework for Network-Based Science and Education //
Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. – 2017. – Vol. 75. – PP. 263–272.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59451-4_26.
11.
Pavlova, D., Garanovich, M. Variability of Semantic Structure of
Oral Spontaneous Monologues “About Myself” depending on “Gender” Factor //
Nauchnyi dialog. – 2019. – I. 5. – PP. 107–122.
DOI:
10.24224/2227-1295-2019-5-107-122.
12.
Shchebetenko, S. Reflexive Characteristic Adaptations Explain Sex
Differences in the Big Five: But not in Neuroticism // Personality and
Individual Differences. – 2017. – Vol. 111. – PP. 153–156.
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.013.
13.
Zelyanskaya, N., Belousov, K., Ichkineeva, D. Naive Geography and
Geopolitical Semiotics: the Semiotic Analysis of Geomental Maps of Russians //
Semiotica. – 2017. – Vol. 2017, I. 215. – PP. 235–253.
DOI:
10.1515/sem-2016-0231.
14.
Shneiderman, B. The Eyes Have It: a Task by Data Type Taxonomy for
Information Visualizations // Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual
Languages. – 1996.
DOI: 10.1109/VL.1996.545307.
15.
Vorobev, A.V., Vorobeva, G.R. Web-Oriented 2D/3D-Visualization of
Geomagnetic Field and Its Variations Parameters // Scientific Visualization. –
2017. – Vol. 9, No. 2.
PP. 94–101.
16.
Boronnikova, N., Taleski, A., Belousov, K., Ryabinin, K. Visual
Representation of the Egocentric Field of the Speaker in the Macedonian
Language (Experimental Study) // Perm University Herald.
Russian
and Foreign Philology. – 2018. – Vol. 10, I. 3. – PP. 13–27. DOI:
10.17072/2037-6681-2018-3-13-27.
17.
Belousov, K., Erofeeva, E., Baranov, D., Zelyanskaya, N.,
Shchebetenko, S. The Multi-Parameter Analysis of Linguistic Data in the
Information System Semograf (On the Example of the Study of Social Network
Users’ Speech // Tomsk State University Journal of Philology. – 2020. – I. 64.
– PP. 6–29.
DOI: 10.17223/19986645/64/1.
18.
Linguists of Perm University Became Curators of Scientific Research
at the Educational Center “Sirius” [Electronic Resource] // PSU. – 2019. URL:
http://www.psu.ru/news/lingvisty-permskogo-universiteta-stali-kuratorami-nauchnogo-issledovaniya-v-obrazovatelnom-tsentre-sirius
(last accessed 17.10.2020).